<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Owe You an Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.archny.org/index.php/i-owe-you-an-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.archny.org/index.php/i-owe-you-an-update/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 18:52:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://blog.archny.org/index.php/i-owe-you-an-update/comment-page-5/#comment-61519</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 03:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.archny.org/?p=2291#comment-61519</guid>
		<description>Below is a list of Catholic Bishops either planning on attending or sending greetings to the &quot;Rally for Religious Freedom&quot;,being held throughout the United States at noon Friday 
March 23rd. There are 194 Bishops in the United States, not including Puerto Rico or other territories, and only 15 are planning on doing anything. Our religious freedom is being threatened. 
On Saturday March 24, 2012, in Washington DC thousand of Atheists will participate in a &quot;Reason Rally&quot;. Wake up church leaders. STOP drinking &quot;social justice&quot; tea and get real and get back to basics. GOD is watching and taking notes. We need leaders willing to stand for Religious Freedom no matter who&#039;s religion it may be. 
Most Rev. Robert J. Baker, S.T.D., Bishop of the Diocese of Birmingham
    Most Rev. Salvatore Cordileone, Bishop of the Diocese of Oakland
    Most Rev. Cirilo Flores, Coadjutor Bishop of the Diocese of San Diego
    Most Rev. Thomas Doran, Bishop of the Diocese of Rockford
    Most Rev. Kenneth Steiner, Auxiliary Bishop Emeritus of the Archdiocese of Portland
    Most Rev. John Quinn, Bishop of the Diocese of Winona
    Most Rev. John Kudrick, Bishop of the Eparchy of Parma
    Most Rev. David Choby, Bishop of the Diocese of Nashville
    Most Rev. John Yanta, Bishop Emeritus of Amarillo Diocese
    Most Rev. Robert Morlino, Bishop of the Diocese of Madison
    Most Rev. Leonard Blair, Bishop of the Diocese of Toledo
    Most Rev. Joseph Latino, Bishop of the Diocese of Jackson
    Most Rev. Peter Jugis, Bishop of the Diocese of Charlotte
    Most Rev. Luis Zarama, Auxiliary Bishop of the Diocese of Atlanta
    Most Rev. Michael Byrnes, Auxiliary Bishop of the Diocese of Detroit
    Most Rev. Mitchell Rozanski, Auxiliary Bishop
Ok where are the rest of you holy men, not attending the Atheist Rally in Washington, DC, I hope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Below is a list of Catholic Bishops either planning on attending or sending greetings to the &#8220;Rally for Religious Freedom&#8221;,being held throughout the United States at noon Friday<br />
March 23rd. There are 194 Bishops in the United States, not including Puerto Rico or other territories, and only 15 are planning on doing anything. Our religious freedom is being threatened.<br />
On Saturday March 24, 2012, in Washington DC thousand of Atheists will participate in a &#8220;Reason Rally&#8221;. Wake up church leaders. STOP drinking &#8220;social justice&#8221; tea and get real and get back to basics. GOD is watching and taking notes. We need leaders willing to stand for Religious Freedom no matter who&#8217;s religion it may be.<br />
Most Rev. Robert J. Baker, S.T.D., Bishop of the Diocese of Birmingham<br />
    Most Rev. Salvatore Cordileone, Bishop of the Diocese of Oakland<br />
    Most Rev. Cirilo Flores, Coadjutor Bishop of the Diocese of San Diego<br />
    Most Rev. Thomas Doran, Bishop of the Diocese of Rockford<br />
    Most Rev. Kenneth Steiner, Auxiliary Bishop Emeritus of the Archdiocese of Portland<br />
    Most Rev. John Quinn, Bishop of the Diocese of Winona<br />
    Most Rev. John Kudrick, Bishop of the Eparchy of Parma<br />
    Most Rev. David Choby, Bishop of the Diocese of Nashville<br />
    Most Rev. John Yanta, Bishop Emeritus of Amarillo Diocese<br />
    Most Rev. Robert Morlino, Bishop of the Diocese of Madison<br />
    Most Rev. Leonard Blair, Bishop of the Diocese of Toledo<br />
    Most Rev. Joseph Latino, Bishop of the Diocese of Jackson<br />
    Most Rev. Peter Jugis, Bishop of the Diocese of Charlotte<br />
    Most Rev. Luis Zarama, Auxiliary Bishop of the Diocese of Atlanta<br />
    Most Rev. Michael Byrnes, Auxiliary Bishop of the Diocese of Detroit<br />
    Most Rev. Mitchell Rozanski, Auxiliary Bishop<br />
Ok where are the rest of you holy men, not attending the Atheist Rally in Washington, DC, I hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MF</title>
		<link>http://blog.archny.org/index.php/i-owe-you-an-update/comment-page-5/#comment-61406</link>
		<dc:creator>MF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.archny.org/?p=2291#comment-61406</guid>
		<description>Please do not compromise. At this point the Church has the duty to take this issue to court to protect the Bill of Rights. Anything short of freedom of religion is not acceptable. We are the stewards of this beautiful document that was written by men but, when one reads it, lets face it that it was inspired by religion and our desire to be more Christ like. It would be like allowing some government to change Bible chapters just to make it convenient to sin. We know this has been attempted in the past.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please do not compromise. At this point the Church has the duty to take this issue to court to protect the Bill of Rights. Anything short of freedom of religion is not acceptable. We are the stewards of this beautiful document that was written by men but, when one reads it, lets face it that it was inspired by religion and our desire to be more Christ like. It would be like allowing some government to change Bible chapters just to make it convenient to sin. We know this has been attempted in the past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda Wulf</title>
		<link>http://blog.archny.org/index.php/i-owe-you-an-update/comment-page-5/#comment-61082</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda Wulf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 03:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.archny.org/?p=2291#comment-61082</guid>
		<description>Let us ask St. Joseph, the patron of the Universal Church and the patron of Families to pray for us and with us, especially on his feast day, March 19th.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let us ask St. Joseph, the patron of the Universal Church and the patron of Families to pray for us and with us, especially on his feast day, March 19th.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Kavanagh</title>
		<link>http://blog.archny.org/index.php/i-owe-you-an-update/comment-page-5/#comment-61060</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Kavanagh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 12:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.archny.org/?p=2291#comment-61060</guid>
		<description>The Constitutional Question.
 
As much as the Obama Administration may want to make some sort of accommodation” here, for political purposes, as the Executive Branch of our Federal Government the Admin probably shouldn&#039;t, just as the Legislative and Judicial Branches of the Federal Government probably shouldn&#039;t as well.
 
After all, this is indeed a Constitutional Question.
 
Making an &quot;accommodation&quot; would, in itself, be a violation of the 1st Amendment to the US Constitution, which states in part:
 
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;…”
 
So then, to make an“accommodation” the Admin (as the Executive Branch; or the Legislative or the Judicial Branches) would be violating both the spirit and the original intent of the “no law” portion of the amendment, in that to make “an accommodation” would in effect be making “a law” “respecting” a “religion”, which while not precisely acting in an effort at “establishment of religion” is tantamount to doing so.
 
The “prohibiting the free exercise thereof” phrase of the 1st Amendment is not a consideration here either.
 
The Framers of the US Constitution in no way meant by that phrase that a religion, in this case the Catholic religion, could carve out for itself a niche which sets itself apart from all other entities operating here in the US under the protections guaranteed by the US Constitution. A fundamental precept of our government in the US is that we are all equal under the law.
 
Rather, the Framers, by that phrase meant that the Federal Government could make “no law” “prohibiting the free exercise” of the practices of a religion.
 
In the specific case of the Catholic religion here that means that the Federal Government is prohibited by the 1st Amendment from making a law that would prohibit the Catholic Mass, or Baptism, or Confirmation, etc., what the Catholic Church refers to as the “rites” of its religion.
 
In no way did the Framers intend that phrase to go beyond that and allow any religious entity to not comply with the laws of the US, as in this case, to not provide complete health insurance for its employees of its various organizations on the grounds that to do so would be a matter of a violation of “religious conscience”.
 
Nowhere in the phrasing of the portion of the 1st Amendment which addresses religious freedom, quoted above, do the Framers include wording addressing, or implying, “religious conscience”. To somehow read into that portion of the amendment anything more than it explicitly states would be a violation of our “strict interpretation” concept regarding the US Constitution.
 
As one of the Framers may have said, “Beware the tyranny of the Pulpit.”
 
And for all of us who live under the protections of the Constitution we are “In for a penny, in for a Pound.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Constitutional Question.</p>
<p>As much as the Obama Administration may want to make some sort of accommodation” here, for political purposes, as the Executive Branch of our Federal Government the Admin probably shouldn&#8217;t, just as the Legislative and Judicial Branches of the Federal Government probably shouldn&#8217;t as well.</p>
<p>After all, this is indeed a Constitutional Question.</p>
<p>Making an &#8220;accommodation&#8221; would, in itself, be a violation of the 1st Amendment to the US Constitution, which states in part:</p>
<p>“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;…”</p>
<p>So then, to make an“accommodation” the Admin (as the Executive Branch; or the Legislative or the Judicial Branches) would be violating both the spirit and the original intent of the “no law” portion of the amendment, in that to make “an accommodation” would in effect be making “a law” “respecting” a “religion”, which while not precisely acting in an effort at “establishment of religion” is tantamount to doing so.</p>
<p>The “prohibiting the free exercise thereof” phrase of the 1st Amendment is not a consideration here either.</p>
<p>The Framers of the US Constitution in no way meant by that phrase that a religion, in this case the Catholic religion, could carve out for itself a niche which sets itself apart from all other entities operating here in the US under the protections guaranteed by the US Constitution. A fundamental precept of our government in the US is that we are all equal under the law.</p>
<p>Rather, the Framers, by that phrase meant that the Federal Government could make “no law” “prohibiting the free exercise” of the practices of a religion.</p>
<p>In the specific case of the Catholic religion here that means that the Federal Government is prohibited by the 1st Amendment from making a law that would prohibit the Catholic Mass, or Baptism, or Confirmation, etc., what the Catholic Church refers to as the “rites” of its religion.</p>
<p>In no way did the Framers intend that phrase to go beyond that and allow any religious entity to not comply with the laws of the US, as in this case, to not provide complete health insurance for its employees of its various organizations on the grounds that to do so would be a matter of a violation of “religious conscience”.</p>
<p>Nowhere in the phrasing of the portion of the 1st Amendment which addresses religious freedom, quoted above, do the Framers include wording addressing, or implying, “religious conscience”. To somehow read into that portion of the amendment anything more than it explicitly states would be a violation of our “strict interpretation” concept regarding the US Constitution.</p>
<p>As one of the Framers may have said, “Beware the tyranny of the Pulpit.”</p>
<p>And for all of us who live under the protections of the Constitution we are “In for a penny, in for a Pound.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lamont Applegate</title>
		<link>http://blog.archny.org/index.php/i-owe-you-an-update/comment-page-5/#comment-60869</link>
		<dc:creator>Lamont Applegate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 22:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.archny.org/?p=2291#comment-60869</guid>
		<description>Cardinal Dolan,
Thank you for boldly representing our Church&#039;s position relating to this most agriegious attack on our religious freedoms.  I am and will continue to pray for you, our bishops, priests, brothers, sisters and lay leaders.  May Our Lord continue to protect, guide and bless you always.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cardinal Dolan,<br />
Thank you for boldly representing our Church&#8217;s position relating to this most agriegious attack on our religious freedoms.  I am and will continue to pray for you, our bishops, priests, brothers, sisters and lay leaders.  May Our Lord continue to protect, guide and bless you always.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raymond Bejnart</title>
		<link>http://blog.archny.org/index.php/i-owe-you-an-update/comment-page-5/#comment-60855</link>
		<dc:creator>Raymond Bejnart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 11:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.archny.org/?p=2291#comment-60855</guid>
		<description>Your Eminence Cardinal Dolan:
I wish to point out that our religious liberties are at stake,
morr so than ever begore. Catholics in this country need to 
be united in the fact that we have to offer our country to God
through our Lord and Saviour Christ Jesus.We have an opportunity
to elect for President a man who truely values the true Catholic traditions
of justice, leadership, and integrity. We the Church need to be in support
of Rick Santorum. He is the only choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your Eminence Cardinal Dolan:<br />
I wish to point out that our religious liberties are at stake,<br />
morr so than ever begore. Catholics in this country need to<br />
be united in the fact that we have to offer our country to God<br />
through our Lord and Saviour Christ Jesus.We have an opportunity<br />
to elect for President a man who truely values the true Catholic traditions<br />
of justice, leadership, and integrity. We the Church need to be in support<br />
of Rick Santorum. He is the only choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meg Lark</title>
		<link>http://blog.archny.org/index.php/i-owe-you-an-update/comment-page-5/#comment-60838</link>
		<dc:creator>Meg Lark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.archny.org/?p=2291#comment-60838</guid>
		<description>Your Eminence:  Don&#039;t forget to get backing from clerics of the Eastern Orthodox Church and Orthodox Jewish faiths, especially the Hasidim - none of these people believe in artificial birth control, either.  The Left insists on framing this as an exclusively Catholic issue, and then they ridicule the &quot;out-of-touch&quot; Catholics with off-the-wall statements like &quot;98% of Catholic women use birth control&quot; - first of all, I&#039;m pretty sure that WAY more than 2% of Catholic women are beyond the age of child-bearing, so why would they need birth control?!  And second, so Catholic women use birth control - what&#039;s the issue?  Is there a statistic on how many of those women use *natural* birth control, which the Catholic Church has *never* banned?!  You need to take the battle to these ignorami and call them on their prejudices, for prejudice it mose certainly is.  Meanwhile, prepare for the next battle:  http://rt.com/news/uk-bans-wearing-cross-317/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your Eminence:  Don&#8217;t forget to get backing from clerics of the Eastern Orthodox Church and Orthodox Jewish faiths, especially the Hasidim &#8211; none of these people believe in artificial birth control, either.  The Left insists on framing this as an exclusively Catholic issue, and then they ridicule the &#8220;out-of-touch&#8221; Catholics with off-the-wall statements like &#8220;98% of Catholic women use birth control&#8221; &#8211; first of all, I&#8217;m pretty sure that WAY more than 2% of Catholic women are beyond the age of child-bearing, so why would they need birth control?!  And second, so Catholic women use birth control &#8211; what&#8217;s the issue?  Is there a statistic on how many of those women use *natural* birth control, which the Catholic Church has *never* banned?!  You need to take the battle to these ignorami and call them on their prejudices, for prejudice it mose certainly is.  Meanwhile, prepare for the next battle:  <a href="http://rt.com/news/uk-bans-wearing-cross-317/" rel="nofollow">http://rt.com/news/uk-bans-wearing-cross-317/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John J. Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://blog.archny.org/index.php/i-owe-you-an-update/comment-page-5/#comment-60822</link>
		<dc:creator>John J. Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 19:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.archny.org/?p=2291#comment-60822</guid>
		<description>If individuals were able to puchase affordable health care coverage and choose coverage that was consistent with their individual conscience, the government would not be impinging on anyone&#039;s freedom of conscience. The linkage bettween employment and insurance coverage is an historical correlate to the 95% top marginal income tax rates of the WWII and immediate postwar era. 

Rather than pursue true reform that would empower individuals, the administration has chosen a massive aggrandizement of federal power over employer-provided coverage intended in the longer run to bankrupt private insurance coverage to pave the way for single-payer government monopolized health care that will treat us as serfs or even breedstock over whom decisions are made on the basis of something akin to Dr. Zeke Emanuel&#039;s &quot;whole lives&quot; rationing system. 

True reform would empower individuals and allow market forces to impose discipline on prices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If individuals were able to puchase affordable health care coverage and choose coverage that was consistent with their individual conscience, the government would not be impinging on anyone&#8217;s freedom of conscience. The linkage bettween employment and insurance coverage is an historical correlate to the 95% top marginal income tax rates of the WWII and immediate postwar era. </p>
<p>Rather than pursue true reform that would empower individuals, the administration has chosen a massive aggrandizement of federal power over employer-provided coverage intended in the longer run to bankrupt private insurance coverage to pave the way for single-payer government monopolized health care that will treat us as serfs or even breedstock over whom decisions are made on the basis of something akin to Dr. Zeke Emanuel&#8217;s &#8220;whole lives&#8221; rationing system. </p>
<p>True reform would empower individuals and allow market forces to impose discipline on prices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John J. Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://blog.archny.org/index.php/i-owe-you-an-update/comment-page-5/#comment-60820</link>
		<dc:creator>John J. Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 19:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.archny.org/?p=2291#comment-60820</guid>
		<description>Cardinal Dolan - I now live at the other end of this great country, but was educated within the territory of your Archdicocese and lived there many years. My son lives now in Spanish Harlem, just starting out his adult life in these perilous times. One of my high school teachers went on to become Editor of America magazine, so I know of what you speak in that regard. I too find its call to appeasement and minimization of the seriousness of these regulations regrettable and misguided. 

I want to thank you for courageously speaking out against this assault upon the unalienable God-given right to freedom of conscience of all Americans at a time when another right - the right of all of us to freedom of speech similarly acknowledged by the First Amendment - hangs by a thread. We face a looming darkness in this world. Many in Europe understand it because they have lived with it and know their history. Many of them fear we Americans are at even greater risk of falling under its spell because we have not. Where will we go if freedom is extinguished in America? Where will we find refuge?

God endowed us with certain rights for a purpose. Rights are not ends in and of themselves. They are the sine qua non of each of us being able to choose to follow the call of God, or not, free of being &quot;nudged&quot; or more forcefully coerced by the state. That is why your stand is so important to us and, IMHO, in the eyes of God. So many have forgotten that the rights we so proudly declare ownership of as Americans come only from God, and never from the largesse of a mortal political class. The HHS mandate is a fine example of how so-called &quot;rights,&quot; manufactured out of thin air by mere mortal rulers, inevitably have the effect, whether intended or not, of impinging on the legitimate rights we are endowed with by God. 

To a large extent the source of this animosity toward the American Catholic Church and its charitable service affiliates has to do with it standing in the way of an agenda of so-called &quot;social and economic justice&quot; or collective salvation that illegitimately arrogates to Caesar the authority to use our individual call to charitable acts as a pretext for collectivizing the citizenry as they are led down the &quot;Road to Serfdom.&quot; Did Jesus not say &quot;render unto Caesar that which is Caesar&#039;s?&quot; Is it Caesar&#039;s to confiscate from us our responsibility to tithe as a pretext for confiscating all wealth and redistributing it so that everyone&#039;s &quot;needs&quot; are met to the extent determined appropriate by the ruling class? This call to defend religious freedom must also be a call to reclaim our responsibility as Christians from the modern bureaucratic state. 

This nation is one based upon a revolutionary ideology informed by the Judaeo-Christian faith tradition that has enabled Catholics to pursue their paths toward God and their Church to flourish. It was a revolution accomplished before the first shot was fired - largely the product of the work of ministers of the faith - admittedly mostly Protestant - who formed what the King of England scorned as the &quot;Black Robe Regiment.&quot; Our nation was born of that first great awakening. It renewed the pledge of the preamble to the Declaration during the second great awakening that produced the antebellum movement to abolish first the African slave trade and then slavery itself. For over 100 years our nation has drifted from its faith and founding ideology, while purveyors of various European collectivist ideologies have worked &quot;progresively,&quot; incrementally, imperceptably to cause generations to forget who they are and to prepare them for surrendering what cannot be surrendered - God&#039;s unalienable rights. I believe we are at the beginning of a third great awakening that offers the opportunity to renew our faith in God and bring about the &quot;fundamental restoration&quot; of our constitutionally limited republic rather than its &quot;fundamental transformation&quot; into just one more oppressive, decadent collectivist society. I consider you a member of this generation&#039;s &quot;Black Robe Regiment&quot; and hope you consider that a compliment. 

God bless you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cardinal Dolan &#8211; I now live at the other end of this great country, but was educated within the territory of your Archdicocese and lived there many years. My son lives now in Spanish Harlem, just starting out his adult life in these perilous times. One of my high school teachers went on to become Editor of America magazine, so I know of what you speak in that regard. I too find its call to appeasement and minimization of the seriousness of these regulations regrettable and misguided. </p>
<p>I want to thank you for courageously speaking out against this assault upon the unalienable God-given right to freedom of conscience of all Americans at a time when another right &#8211; the right of all of us to freedom of speech similarly acknowledged by the First Amendment &#8211; hangs by a thread. We face a looming darkness in this world. Many in Europe understand it because they have lived with it and know their history. Many of them fear we Americans are at even greater risk of falling under its spell because we have not. Where will we go if freedom is extinguished in America? Where will we find refuge?</p>
<p>God endowed us with certain rights for a purpose. Rights are not ends in and of themselves. They are the sine qua non of each of us being able to choose to follow the call of God, or not, free of being &#8220;nudged&#8221; or more forcefully coerced by the state. That is why your stand is so important to us and, IMHO, in the eyes of God. So many have forgotten that the rights we so proudly declare ownership of as Americans come only from God, and never from the largesse of a mortal political class. The HHS mandate is a fine example of how so-called &#8220;rights,&#8221; manufactured out of thin air by mere mortal rulers, inevitably have the effect, whether intended or not, of impinging on the legitimate rights we are endowed with by God. </p>
<p>To a large extent the source of this animosity toward the American Catholic Church and its charitable service affiliates has to do with it standing in the way of an agenda of so-called &#8220;social and economic justice&#8221; or collective salvation that illegitimately arrogates to Caesar the authority to use our individual call to charitable acts as a pretext for collectivizing the citizenry as they are led down the &#8220;Road to Serfdom.&#8221; Did Jesus not say &#8220;render unto Caesar that which is Caesar&#8217;s?&#8221; Is it Caesar&#8217;s to confiscate from us our responsibility to tithe as a pretext for confiscating all wealth and redistributing it so that everyone&#8217;s &#8220;needs&#8221; are met to the extent determined appropriate by the ruling class? This call to defend religious freedom must also be a call to reclaim our responsibility as Christians from the modern bureaucratic state. </p>
<p>This nation is one based upon a revolutionary ideology informed by the Judaeo-Christian faith tradition that has enabled Catholics to pursue their paths toward God and their Church to flourish. It was a revolution accomplished before the first shot was fired &#8211; largely the product of the work of ministers of the faith &#8211; admittedly mostly Protestant &#8211; who formed what the King of England scorned as the &#8220;Black Robe Regiment.&#8221; Our nation was born of that first great awakening. It renewed the pledge of the preamble to the Declaration during the second great awakening that produced the antebellum movement to abolish first the African slave trade and then slavery itself. For over 100 years our nation has drifted from its faith and founding ideology, while purveyors of various European collectivist ideologies have worked &#8220;progresively,&#8221; incrementally, imperceptably to cause generations to forget who they are and to prepare them for surrendering what cannot be surrendered &#8211; God&#8217;s unalienable rights. I believe we are at the beginning of a third great awakening that offers the opportunity to renew our faith in God and bring about the &#8220;fundamental restoration&#8221; of our constitutionally limited republic rather than its &#8220;fundamental transformation&#8221; into just one more oppressive, decadent collectivist society. I consider you a member of this generation&#8217;s &#8220;Black Robe Regiment&#8221; and hope you consider that a compliment. </p>
<p>God bless you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Amadan</title>
		<link>http://blog.archny.org/index.php/i-owe-you-an-update/comment-page-5/#comment-60819</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Amadan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 18:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.archny.org/?p=2291#comment-60819</guid>
		<description>God love you Cardinal Dolan but it looks like the episcopacy wants to blow another opportunity to educate the Faithful and the World.

http://romancatholicreport.com/id192.html


There is no end with this approach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God love you Cardinal Dolan but it looks like the episcopacy wants to blow another opportunity to educate the Faithful and the World.</p>
<p><a href="http://romancatholicreport.com/id192.html" rel="nofollow">http://romancatholicreport.com/id192.html</a></p>
<p>There is no end with this approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
