There have been many results from the Supreme Court’s religious freedom ruling in the Hobby Lobby/Conestoga Wood case. One is that we can more readily identify many people who either lack fundamental reading comprehension skills or are subject to such ideological blindness that they egregiously mis-characterize what the case actually held.
Perhaps most important, though, is that we can now see very clearly who the enemies of religious freedom are — and we can see that they are heavily represented in the Democratic Party delegations in Congress.
This can be seen very plainly from new bills introduced in both the House and the Senate (S.2578 and H.R.5051), reportedly in consultation with the Administration. These bills purport to be a way of overturning the Hobby Lobby/Conestoga Wood decision, and forcing for-profit businesses to comply with the HHS mandate to provide insurance coverage for abortion-causing drugs, contraception, and sterilization.
But they go much, much further than that. In fact, they directly and seriously endanger the religious freedom of every church and religious non-profit, and any other organization that is operated by faith-based persons who don’t want to cooperate with evil. This is a proposal of “startling breadth” (to quote Justice Ginsburg’s dissent in Hobby Lobby/Conestoga Wood), and astonishing audacity.
As with every bit of legislation the devil (literally) is in the details. So let’s break down the actual language of the bill, and explain what it means. Here is what the House version of the bill says (in italics), with my analysis to follow:
(a) In General — An employer that establishes or maintains a group health plan for its employees (and any covered dependents of such employees) shall not deny coverage of a specific health care item or service with respect to such employees (or dependents) where the coverage of such item or service is required under any provision of Federal law or the regulations promulgated thereunder.
The key word here is “employer”. Nowhere in the bill does it define that word, so it is an outright lie to claim that the bill is limited to overturning the Supreme Court’s decision, which was limited to family-owned corporations. This bill would instead reach every single employer in the United States that has an employee health plan — individual business owners, churches, schools. Nobody would be exempted.
It would also cover any health care “item or service” required to be covered by federal law or regulation — which is so broad as to potentially include any number of evils our federal government might choose, such as abortion, contraception, IVF, sex-change operations, and euthanasia drugs.
The significance of this becomes even more clear when we look at another section of the bill:
(b) Application — Subsection (a) shall apply notwithstanding any other provision of Federal law, including [the Religious Freedom Restoration Act].
This would give employers essentially no defense to any law passed by Congress or imposed by executive fiat that would substantially burden their faith by requiring them to cooperate with evil. In other words, people of faith would be reduced to second-class citizen status. This echoes infamous prior court decisions, as if the bill’s sponsors thought that religious employers “had no rights which the [government] was bound to respect” (to quote the Dred Scott decision], or as if they were not “recognized in the law as persons in the whole sense” (to quote Roe v. Wade).
It gets even worse — here’s where the real evil lies:
(c) Regulations — The regulations [relating to the current HHS mandate] shall apply with respect to this section. The Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and the Treasury may modify such regulations consistent with the purpose and findings of this Act.
In other words, the government shall have carte blanche to change the HHS mandate at a whim, or to impose any other mandate they wish. So there is no limit to what can be done by a future administration with even more commitment to the Cult of Moloch (i.e., the Planned Parenthood, pro-death agenda) than the current regime. Nothing would stop them from removing the current HHS mandate exemption for churches and “accommodation” for religious non-profits, and enact regulations that would require coverage for abortion, euthanasia, you name it — and there would be no defense under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
If there were any further question about the fragility of religious freedom in America today, this bill removes any doubt. The sponsors of this wicked bill have openly declared themselves to be enemies of religious freedom.
Here is a list of the House sponsors — 142 as of the date this is posted, all of them Democrats. Here are the Senate sponsors — 42 of them, all Democrats, including the original sponsor of RFRA, our own Senator Charles Schumer. If your representative is on the list, contact them right away.
Nelson Mandela once said “I cherish my own freedom dearly, but I care even more for your freedom.” Ask your representative why they don’t agree, and remember well the answer, when they come asking for your vote.