<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Secularism in Action &#8212; In the Supreme Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2000" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2000</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 15:45:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2000&#038;cpage=1#comment-11819</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 16:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2000#comment-11819</guid>
		<description>Oh dear. I gotta hand it to the secularists. They can spot a legal winner for our times when they see one. 

All the right secular elements are there: The teacher is a woman. She&#039;s young. Her disability is physical (narcolepsy) and though not curable is can be helped by medication and lifestyle adjustments. She taught nonreligious subjects. All very sympathetic. She could be your daughter, your friend, your mother. 
 
And what do we have on the other side?

A religious institution. (Ugh! or perhaps Ho hum!) Operating outside the law. (Grrrrr).  Able to deny this perfect person (in legal terms) her civil rights. (Bad.)

After reading this:  I pray for our lawyers. I thank God I am not a lawyer and can&#039;t possibly follow the stomach-turning details. I should perhaps be more attentive to all the Scripture involving Pharisees and Biblical rulers. St. Thomas More, pray for us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh dear. I gotta hand it to the secularists. They can spot a legal winner for our times when they see one. </p>
<p>All the right secular elements are there: The teacher is a woman. She&#8217;s young. Her disability is physical (narcolepsy) and though not curable is can be helped by medication and lifestyle adjustments. She taught nonreligious subjects. All very sympathetic. She could be your daughter, your friend, your mother. </p>
<p>And what do we have on the other side?</p>
<p>A religious institution. (Ugh! or perhaps Ho hum!) Operating outside the law. (Grrrrr).  Able to deny this perfect person (in legal terms) her civil rights. (Bad.)</p>
<p>After reading this:  I pray for our lawyers. I thank God I am not a lawyer and can&#8217;t possibly follow the stomach-turning details. I should perhaps be more attentive to all the Scripture involving Pharisees and Biblical rulers. St. Thomas More, pray for us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Archdiocese of New York &#8211; Secularism in Action: In the Supreme Court &#124; Becket Fund</title>
		<link>http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2000&#038;cpage=1#comment-10501</link>
		<dc:creator>Archdiocese of New York &#8211; Secularism in Action: In the Supreme Court &#124; Becket Fund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 22:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2000#comment-10501</guid>
		<description>[...] for wisdom on the Supreme Court — and await with trepidation the decision in this momentous case. Click here for the original post.&#160;    Bookmark [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for wisdom on the Supreme Court — and await with trepidation the decision in this momentous case. Click here for the original post.&nbsp;    Bookmark [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
