<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Re-Orienting the Marriage Conversation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2016" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2016</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 15:45:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jurek</title>
		<link>http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2016&#038;cpage=1#comment-13378</link>
		<dc:creator>Jurek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 14:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2016#comment-13378</guid>
		<description>1.As you point out,  the  gays make up a small percentage of the population. However, your inference is that because they are small percentage, just maybe they don&#039;t not have rights too? 

2.  Why is not more talk about what really is hurting marriage, and hurting children?  In my opinion, this is fact that so many Catholic girls and other girls in society have babies and don&#039;t not get married.  I was visiting Los Angeles in state of California  this summer with wife  and I happened to  visit the beautiful Our Lady of the Angels Cathedral.  There was preparations for baptism to occur shortly. Maybe  150 parents stood in long line with their little ones waiting for baptisms, registering themselves. I took nice  photographs of all the happy peoples.  Well,  I started talking to one of the ladies organizers who was not  Mexican like almost all the mothers and children.  More than half the children were like  4, 5, 6, 7 years old. Not too many little infants.  At first, I  think to myself that this is first communion. But no, baptism.  The ladies registering tell me that most of the parents were not married, and just look around.  Where are the fathers?  Of course, there were some, covered with their tattoos and others looking not too much like gangsters in church. But really, shouldn&#039;t our religion have more upset about encouraging the young  peoples having sex to get married? This is not a message that the young peoples having sex will listen to bishops in dress talking about.  There needs to be  really married couples saying that marriage is really good.  These young girls with all the kids think like America is what you see on soap operas on television.   This is the threat to marriage. This is the hardship for all the little children. No marriage, no fathers.   I saw some of the gays there.  They were helping to organize the long lines, registerstration the peoples, and sing in the choir.  They were not destroying marriage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.As you point out,  the  gays make up a small percentage of the population. However, your inference is that because they are small percentage, just maybe they don&#8217;t not have rights too? </p>
<p>2.  Why is not more talk about what really is hurting marriage, and hurting children?  In my opinion, this is fact that so many Catholic girls and other girls in society have babies and don&#8217;t not get married.  I was visiting Los Angeles in state of California  this summer with wife  and I happened to  visit the beautiful Our Lady of the Angels Cathedral.  There was preparations for baptism to occur shortly. Maybe  150 parents stood in long line with their little ones waiting for baptisms, registering themselves. I took nice  photographs of all the happy peoples.  Well,  I started talking to one of the ladies organizers who was not  Mexican like almost all the mothers and children.  More than half the children were like  4, 5, 6, 7 years old. Not too many little infants.  At first, I  think to myself that this is first communion. But no, baptism.  The ladies registering tell me that most of the parents were not married, and just look around.  Where are the fathers?  Of course, there were some, covered with their tattoos and others looking not too much like gangsters in church. But really, shouldn&#8217;t our religion have more upset about encouraging the young  peoples having sex to get married? This is not a message that the young peoples having sex will listen to bishops in dress talking about.  There needs to be  really married couples saying that marriage is really good.  These young girls with all the kids think like America is what you see on soap operas on television.   This is the threat to marriage. This is the hardship for all the little children. No marriage, no fathers.   I saw some of the gays there.  They were helping to organize the long lines, registerstration the peoples, and sing in the choir.  They were not destroying marriage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward</title>
		<link>http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2016&#038;cpage=1#comment-13346</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 18:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2016#comment-13346</guid>
		<description>I too have evolved to understand the Church a bit better. Of course, it took me 53 years!

But the wait was worth it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too have evolved to understand the Church a bit better. Of course, it took me 53 years!</p>
<p>But the wait was worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2016&#038;cpage=1#comment-13220</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 17:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2016#comment-13220</guid>
		<description>Amen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Mechmann</title>
		<link>http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2016&#038;cpage=1#comment-13215</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Mechmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2016#comment-13215</guid>
		<description>Yes, it is hard.  But as the Lord said, &quot;What is impossible with men is possible with God.&quot; (Lk 18:27)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it is hard.  But as the Lord said, &#8220;What is impossible with men is possible with God.&#8221; (Lk 18:27)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2016&#038;cpage=1#comment-13199</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2016#comment-13199</guid>
		<description>I understand Tom giving up on the Church. For walking away. This teaching is hard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand Tom giving up on the Church. For walking away. This teaching is hard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Mechmann</title>
		<link>http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2016&#038;cpage=1#comment-13191</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Mechmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 23:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2016#comment-13191</guid>
		<description>I too used to think that many of the teachings of the Church were oppressive, because they told me that the things I liked to do were against God&#039;s will.  I wanted the Church to tell me that whatever I wanted to do was okay.  And I acted that way.  But it didn&#039;t work -- I was unhappy, and could tell that there was something broken in me.

Over time, with the help of prayer, the good example of others, and the grace of the sacraments, I have come to a different point of view.  

Now, I understand that when the Church tells me that my desires and behavior are displeasing to God, it&#039;s not because the Church hates me.  It&#039;s because of love, and a desire to tell me the truth so that I may be the person that God created me to be.  &quot;Those whom I love, I reprove and chasten&quot; (Rev 3:19). 

I&#039;m still broken, but God has patched me and repaired me over and over again.  Someday, maybe, I&#039;ll be fixed.

I&#039;m sorry that you&#039;ve given up on the Church.  Please keep in mind that God will never give up on you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too used to think that many of the teachings of the Church were oppressive, because they told me that the things I liked to do were against God&#8217;s will.  I wanted the Church to tell me that whatever I wanted to do was okay.  And I acted that way.  But it didn&#8217;t work &#8212; I was unhappy, and could tell that there was something broken in me.</p>
<p>Over time, with the help of prayer, the good example of others, and the grace of the sacraments, I have come to a different point of view.  </p>
<p>Now, I understand that when the Church tells me that my desires and behavior are displeasing to God, it&#8217;s not because the Church hates me.  It&#8217;s because of love, and a desire to tell me the truth so that I may be the person that God created me to be.  &#8220;Those whom I love, I reprove and chasten&#8221; (Rev 3:19). </p>
<p>I&#8217;m still broken, but God has patched me and repaired me over and over again.  Someday, maybe, I&#8217;ll be fixed.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry that you&#8217;ve given up on the Church.  Please keep in mind that God will never give up on you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2016&#038;cpage=1#comment-13190</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 21:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2016#comment-13190</guid>
		<description>Thank you very much for taking the time to write. I appreciate the information and can now move on in my life. I have been holding onto a false hope that at some point the Catholic church would come to it&#039;s senses. Well, at least not during my lifetime. It is always about &quot;sexual morality&quot; with you guys, yet there are some of the worst offenders in your ranks. But, I really do not want to digress. Maybe if you all lightened up and supported healthy, normal relations between consenting adults, the world would be a better place. Thanks for the &quot;Ministry to Persons with a Homosexual Inclination&quot;. I did look through it. It is such a put down and quite frankly repulsive, and like most of the policies of the Catholic Church, terribly repressive. There is no God or Christ in that document. It is full of terrible words.

I give up with the Catholic Church. I am not living the rest of my life listening to things like this. Life is about love, happiness, caring, and all the other things you say are subjective and life is short. I have been in a caring and loving partnership for 16 years and we are getting married in December in NYC. I cant wait. We will not be coming to the Catholic Church ever again. Tolerance, Acceptance and normal ideas about religion are found elsewhere. You profess and believe sexual repression and hateful repression is the way. It is not. Your church is no longer my church.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much for taking the time to write. I appreciate the information and can now move on in my life. I have been holding onto a false hope that at some point the Catholic church would come to it&#8217;s senses. Well, at least not during my lifetime. It is always about &#8220;sexual morality&#8221; with you guys, yet there are some of the worst offenders in your ranks. But, I really do not want to digress. Maybe if you all lightened up and supported healthy, normal relations between consenting adults, the world would be a better place. Thanks for the &#8220;Ministry to Persons with a Homosexual Inclination&#8221;. I did look through it. It is such a put down and quite frankly repulsive, and like most of the policies of the Catholic Church, terribly repressive. There is no God or Christ in that document. It is full of terrible words.</p>
<p>I give up with the Catholic Church. I am not living the rest of my life listening to things like this. Life is about love, happiness, caring, and all the other things you say are subjective and life is short. I have been in a caring and loving partnership for 16 years and we are getting married in December in NYC. I cant wait. We will not be coming to the Catholic Church ever again. Tolerance, Acceptance and normal ideas about religion are found elsewhere. You profess and believe sexual repression and hateful repression is the way. It is not. Your church is no longer my church.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Mechmann</title>
		<link>http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2016&#038;cpage=1#comment-13185</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Mechmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 16:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2016#comment-13185</guid>
		<description>It may be helpful for me to explain how we understand the moral teachings of the Church, and why this particular teaching will never change.  

The moral doctrines of the Church rest on Revelation and natural law.  So, we look to see what God has revealed to us in Sacred Scripture, in the Tradition of the Church (i.e., what has always been taught by the Church), in the nature of the human person, and interpreted for us by the teaching office of the Church (i.e., the pope and the bishops who are in communion with him).   So, in Sacred Scripture we look to the Ten Commandments, the ethical norms taught in the Old Testament, the preaching of Christ, the letters of Paul, taken as a whole.  In Tradition, we look to the teachings of the Fathers of the Church (the great bishops and theologians of the early Church), the Councils, and the bishops throughout history.  If a moral norm has been taught to us in this way, we consider it to be the definitive teaching of Christ, and nobody is  authorized to change it.

When it comes to sexual morality, the core teaching of the Church is that the proper setting for sexual activity is only between a man and a woman who are bound to each other in the covenant of marriage.  Any sexual act other than that fails to satisfy the proper purpose of human sexuality, is contrary to the nature of the human person and the will of God, and is thus gravely immoral.  This norm applies not just to persons of the same sex, but to everyone.  This is taught by Sacred Scripture, has been the universal and perpetual teaching of the Tradition of the Catholic Church, and has been reaffirmed repeatedly and authoritatively by the teaching office of the Church.  We consider it, to use the technical theological term, &quot;irreformable&quot; (i.e., unchangeable). 

Just to put it in context, by the way, the teaching of the Church also unequivocally condemns acts of violence against innocent persons, and specifically has denounced such acts committed against homosexual persons. 

If you want to understand this more clearly than I have explained it, and also to see what the Church teaches about the support that is offered to persons with same-sex attraction, then I recommend that you read the document from the US Bishops, &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;//www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/human-life-and-dignity/homosexuality/upload/minstry-persons-homosexual-inclination-2006.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ministry to Persons with a Homosexual Inclination&lt;/a&gt;&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may be helpful for me to explain how we understand the moral teachings of the Church, and why this particular teaching will never change.  </p>
<p>The moral doctrines of the Church rest on Revelation and natural law.  So, we look to see what God has revealed to us in Sacred Scripture, in the Tradition of the Church (i.e., what has always been taught by the Church), in the nature of the human person, and interpreted for us by the teaching office of the Church (i.e., the pope and the bishops who are in communion with him).   So, in Sacred Scripture we look to the Ten Commandments, the ethical norms taught in the Old Testament, the preaching of Christ, the letters of Paul, taken as a whole.  In Tradition, we look to the teachings of the Fathers of the Church (the great bishops and theologians of the early Church), the Councils, and the bishops throughout history.  If a moral norm has been taught to us in this way, we consider it to be the definitive teaching of Christ, and nobody is  authorized to change it.</p>
<p>When it comes to sexual morality, the core teaching of the Church is that the proper setting for sexual activity is only between a man and a woman who are bound to each other in the covenant of marriage.  Any sexual act other than that fails to satisfy the proper purpose of human sexuality, is contrary to the nature of the human person and the will of God, and is thus gravely immoral.  This norm applies not just to persons of the same sex, but to everyone.  This is taught by Sacred Scripture, has been the universal and perpetual teaching of the Tradition of the Catholic Church, and has been reaffirmed repeatedly and authoritatively by the teaching office of the Church.  We consider it, to use the technical theological term, &#8220;irreformable&#8221; (i.e., unchangeable). </p>
<p>Just to put it in context, by the way, the teaching of the Church also unequivocally condemns acts of violence against innocent persons, and specifically has denounced such acts committed against homosexual persons. </p>
<p>If you want to understand this more clearly than I have explained it, and also to see what the Church teaches about the support that is offered to persons with same-sex attraction, then I recommend that you read the document from the US Bishops, &#8220;<a href="//www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/human-life-and-dignity/homosexuality/upload/minstry-persons-homosexual-inclination-2006.pdf" rel="nofollow">Ministry to Persons with a Homosexual Inclination</a>&#8220;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2016&#038;cpage=1#comment-13184</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2016#comment-13184</guid>
		<description>Thanks very much to the Diocese for providing a forum to discuss these important issues and thank you for calling my approach pure post-modern. That is quite a compliment, and I appreciate it very much! No one ever said that to me before! I will wear that as a badge of honor. 

I am not brushing anything aside, and hardly redefining the definition of Christianity.  Jesus talked about accepting and loving thy neighbor.  Jesus&#039; teachings are quite applicable in the post-modern age we live in. What has become outmoded is the continued discrimination against gays and lesbians by the church and their basic unwillingness to include everyone in the Catholic community. 

To face discrimination in a place of worship is an odd oxymoron. As a powerful and important religious institution, the church could effect a change and instead treat moral codes as more important than people who are being killed, beaten, bashed and bullied simply for who they are. This seems terribly out of step with the teaching of Christ. 

The Catholic Church is on the wrong side of this issue and seems to historically be unwilling, until dragged by public opinion, into accepting the laws of the land in which they operate. 

There are Catholic gays and lesbians who could use the support they everyone else takes for granted from the church. To sanctify their marriages and legitimize their lives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks very much to the Diocese for providing a forum to discuss these important issues and thank you for calling my approach pure post-modern. That is quite a compliment, and I appreciate it very much! No one ever said that to me before! I will wear that as a badge of honor. </p>
<p>I am not brushing anything aside, and hardly redefining the definition of Christianity.  Jesus talked about accepting and loving thy neighbor.  Jesus&#8217; teachings are quite applicable in the post-modern age we live in. What has become outmoded is the continued discrimination against gays and lesbians by the church and their basic unwillingness to include everyone in the Catholic community. </p>
<p>To face discrimination in a place of worship is an odd oxymoron. As a powerful and important religious institution, the church could effect a change and instead treat moral codes as more important than people who are being killed, beaten, bashed and bullied simply for who they are. This seems terribly out of step with the teaching of Christ. </p>
<p>The Catholic Church is on the wrong side of this issue and seems to historically be unwilling, until dragged by public opinion, into accepting the laws of the land in which they operate. </p>
<p>There are Catholic gays and lesbians who could use the support they everyone else takes for granted from the church. To sanctify their marriages and legitimize their lives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Mechmann</title>
		<link>http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2016&#038;cpage=1#comment-13182</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Mechmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2016#comment-13182</guid>
		<description>This is instructive, because it&#039;s an illustration of the post-modern approach in perhaps its purest form.  Questions of truth and meaning brushed aside as mere &quot;playing semantics&quot;, on the assumption that words can mean whatever we want, and there is no objective moral standard by which we are to live.  Re-defining &quot;Christian&quot; in a way that rejects the historical content of the faith, in favor of subjective notions as &quot;tolerance&quot; and &quot;acceptance&quot; (as if all things can and must be accepted).  Attempting to dismiss the teaching of the Church as outmoded or not supported by public opinion, as if the opinions of the public can re-define reality.  Asking that the moral law be re-defined down to the level of our own sinfulness.

Thanks again for confirming the point of the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is instructive, because it&#8217;s an illustration of the post-modern approach in perhaps its purest form.  Questions of truth and meaning brushed aside as mere &#8220;playing semantics&#8221;, on the assumption that words can mean whatever we want, and there is no objective moral standard by which we are to live.  Re-defining &#8220;Christian&#8221; in a way that rejects the historical content of the faith, in favor of subjective notions as &#8220;tolerance&#8221; and &#8220;acceptance&#8221; (as if all things can and must be accepted).  Attempting to dismiss the teaching of the Church as outmoded or not supported by public opinion, as if the opinions of the public can re-define reality.  Asking that the moral law be re-defined down to the level of our own sinfulness.</p>
<p>Thanks again for confirming the point of the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
