<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Next Steps on the Mandate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2522</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 15:45:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela</title>
		<link>http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2522&#038;cpage=1#comment-44891</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 19:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2522#comment-44891</guid>
		<description>In reply to SimpleCatholic ~ WOW are you judgmental and confused!  Nothing I read was full of hating ~ until I got to your remarks…Which appears that you were just venting.  Since you did not address your remark to anyone “The shift from hating the sin to hating the sinner confirms that you no longer should present yourself to receive the Precious Body and Blood of our Lord in the Eucharist” am I to take for granted that you have made the judgment that everyone who disagrees with extending the invitation to Obama is hating the sinner. I hadn’t read a thing about the sin involved till I came upon your angry blog. 

Seems to me that you also assume that only Catholics come to this website.  You have no idea if I am Catholic or not, but be advised that many other religions have the some of the same moral beliefs and values as the Catholic religion.  And for you to assume that because one expresses their disappointment, disapproval, makes a request to withdraw the invitation or not to attend, that they are hating the sinner and not the sin is ludicrous.

Obama has been given the ‘honor’ to speak at the Al Smith dinner which is an ‘honor’ that should NOT be given to a person who has continually attacked the Catholic Church at its core.  He has attacked the sacred rights, the duty to the protection of life, he has redefined marriage and he is forcing things that are not negotiable to the Catholic Church.       
“WHEN THE GOVERNMENT TAMPERS WITH A FREEDOM SO FUNDAMENTAL, ONE SHUDDERS TO THINK WHAT LIES AHEAD.” statement by Cardinal Dolan.

&quot;If you don&#039;t behave as you believe, you will end by believing as you behave.&quot; Ven. Fulton J. Sheen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to SimpleCatholic ~ WOW are you judgmental and confused!  Nothing I read was full of hating ~ until I got to your remarks…Which appears that you were just venting.  Since you did not address your remark to anyone “The shift from hating the sin to hating the sinner confirms that you no longer should present yourself to receive the Precious Body and Blood of our Lord in the Eucharist” am I to take for granted that you have made the judgment that everyone who disagrees with extending the invitation to Obama is hating the sinner. I hadn’t read a thing about the sin involved till I came upon your angry blog. </p>
<p>Seems to me that you also assume that only Catholics come to this website.  You have no idea if I am Catholic or not, but be advised that many other religions have the some of the same moral beliefs and values as the Catholic religion.  And for you to assume that because one expresses their disappointment, disapproval, makes a request to withdraw the invitation or not to attend, that they are hating the sinner and not the sin is ludicrous.</p>
<p>Obama has been given the ‘honor’ to speak at the Al Smith dinner which is an ‘honor’ that should NOT be given to a person who has continually attacked the Catholic Church at its core.  He has attacked the sacred rights, the duty to the protection of life, he has redefined marriage and he is forcing things that are not negotiable to the Catholic Church.<br />
“WHEN THE GOVERNMENT TAMPERS WITH A FREEDOM SO FUNDAMENTAL, ONE SHUDDERS TO THINK WHAT LIES AHEAD.” statement by Cardinal Dolan.</p>
<p>&#8220;If you don&#8217;t behave as you believe, you will end by believing as you behave.&#8221; Ven. Fulton J. Sheen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2522&#038;cpage=1#comment-44759</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 02:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2522#comment-44759</guid>
		<description>I cant believe that you follow up this article with a justification of the scandalous invitation of Obama to the Al Smith dinner.  You note that &quot;All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing&quot;.  How about &quot; All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to hobnob with evil and provide good photo ops with evil&quot;.  How do the Bishops expect the faithful to support their efforts and make a commitment when they can call &quot;time out&quot; and have a little fun with the opposition.  I for one won&#039;t be made a fool of.  If the shepherd begins to socialize with the wolf, the flock will scatter.  Is the money really worth it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cant believe that you follow up this article with a justification of the scandalous invitation of Obama to the Al Smith dinner.  You note that &#8220;All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing&#8221;.  How about &#8221; All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to hobnob with evil and provide good photo ops with evil&#8221;.  How do the Bishops expect the faithful to support their efforts and make a commitment when they can call &#8220;time out&#8221; and have a little fun with the opposition.  I for one won&#8217;t be made a fool of.  If the shepherd begins to socialize with the wolf, the flock will scatter.  Is the money really worth it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leslie Tuttle</title>
		<link>http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2522&#038;cpage=1#comment-44728</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie Tuttle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 21:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2522#comment-44728</guid>
		<description>&quot;Support our Bishops — During this bruising political season, our bishops have been taking a beating in the media. They need our support and help, and it would lift their spirits if they heard from faithful Catholics, in support of their efforts to defend the freedom of the Church.&quot; 

I do support my Bishop and others but it becomes difficult when we are in a battle over out Religious Freedom&amp; more and the Cardinal is going to dine with the man who is bringing this down on us. Do NOT invite Obama to dinner and then tell me to support the bishops. The SCANDAL this will cause is far reaching. Why would any Catholic think they should not vote for Obama when they see him dining with the Cardinal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Support our Bishops — During this bruising political season, our bishops have been taking a beating in the media. They need our support and help, and it would lift their spirits if they heard from faithful Catholics, in support of their efforts to defend the freedom of the Church.&#8221; </p>
<p>I do support my Bishop and others but it becomes difficult when we are in a battle over out Religious Freedom&amp; more and the Cardinal is going to dine with the man who is bringing this down on us. Do NOT invite Obama to dinner and then tell me to support the bishops. The SCANDAL this will cause is far reaching. Why would any Catholic think they should not vote for Obama when they see him dining with the Cardinal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marvn C. Schmidt</title>
		<link>http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2522&#038;cpage=1#comment-43728</link>
		<dc:creator>Marvn C. Schmidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2522#comment-43728</guid>
		<description>&quot;The next steps on the mandate&quot;?  THERE ARE NO NEXT STEPS - IT IS, ON IT&#039;S FACE, ANTI-CATHOLIC.  Don&#039;t you get it Ed???  You,k sir, are as dispicable as Obama for even THINKING about justifying the actions of a failed presidency.  Obama is a person sworn to destroy religious freedom in America.  In any war, killing soldiers is an inconvenience to the Generals, but destroying the respect and power of the opposing Generals is Victory.  Inviting Obama to the Dinner will destroy the Cardinals credibility with many Catholics, and support the Adversary&#039;s General, Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The next steps on the mandate&#8221;?  THERE ARE NO NEXT STEPS &#8211; IT IS, ON IT&#8217;S FACE, ANTI-CATHOLIC.  Don&#8217;t you get it Ed???  You,k sir, are as dispicable as Obama for even THINKING about justifying the actions of a failed presidency.  Obama is a person sworn to destroy religious freedom in America.  In any war, killing soldiers is an inconvenience to the Generals, but destroying the respect and power of the opposing Generals is Victory.  Inviting Obama to the Dinner will destroy the Cardinals credibility with many Catholics, and support the Adversary&#8217;s General, Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernadette DuBois</title>
		<link>http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2522&#038;cpage=1#comment-43540</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernadette DuBois</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 06:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2522#comment-43540</guid>
		<description>I dont know where to sign the petition on this page, but I am giving my concent, because I agree with the petition.  All lambs arn&#039;t stupid enough to go to a slaughter, they follow their master, thats where goats and lambs are different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont know where to sign the petition on this page, but I am giving my concent, because I agree with the petition.  All lambs arn&#8217;t stupid enough to go to a slaughter, they follow their master, thats where goats and lambs are different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcus</title>
		<link>http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2522&#038;cpage=1#comment-42930</link>
		<dc:creator>marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 19:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2522#comment-42930</guid>
		<description>While we pray the Cardinal has dinner with Obama and gives golden PR for his campaign. The faithful are divided just as the Alinsky playbook would have it.
This regime has the USCCB in it&#039;s palm despite the dustup and protest lawsuits. The next Obama term will bring hard rain on the faithful of the Catholic church. A real schism is a high potential with the USCCB being forced to OBEY the state laws that directly opposes and distorts Church teaching. God forbid, we could be facing the rise of the American patriotic catholic church vs the Roman Catholic Church (aka China). But I digress, Lets go to dinner with Obama and be light hearted!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While we pray the Cardinal has dinner with Obama and gives golden PR for his campaign. The faithful are divided just as the Alinsky playbook would have it.<br />
This regime has the USCCB in it&#8217;s palm despite the dustup and protest lawsuits. The next Obama term will bring hard rain on the faithful of the Catholic church. A real schism is a high potential with the USCCB being forced to OBEY the state laws that directly opposes and distorts Church teaching. God forbid, we could be facing the rise of the American patriotic catholic church vs the Roman Catholic Church (aka China). But I digress, Lets go to dinner with Obama and be light hearted!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alice Street</title>
		<link>http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2522&#038;cpage=1#comment-42917</link>
		<dc:creator>Alice Street</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 18:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2522#comment-42917</guid>
		<description>How about adding one more item to your list:
Don&#039;t vote for anyone who supports abortion, contraception madates and opposes conscience rights for Catholic and other Christian workers.
AND
don&#039;t invite Obama to dinner!
AND
while we support our bishops and pray and fast for the Fortnight for Freedom, how about not being stabbed in the back by the very Cardinal who asked use to stand up for our faith???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about adding one more item to your list:<br />
Don&#8217;t vote for anyone who supports abortion, contraception madates and opposes conscience rights for Catholic and other Christian workers.<br />
AND<br />
don&#8217;t invite Obama to dinner!<br />
AND<br />
while we support our bishops and pray and fast for the Fortnight for Freedom, how about not being stabbed in the back by the very Cardinal who asked use to stand up for our faith???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Mechmann</title>
		<link>http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2522&#038;cpage=1#comment-41168</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Mechmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 02:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2522#comment-41168</guid>
		<description>The authority of a bishop has absolutely nothing to do with his personal merits or &quot;credibility&quot;.  It comes from the fact that he has received the fullness of the Sacrament of Holy Orders when he was ordained a bishop.  As such he has received the grace of being a successor of the Apostles, in communion with the Successor of Peter and all other Catholic bishops around the world and throughout time.  In union with them, he leads the particular church that has been entrusted to him and he teaches and governs with the authority of Christ.

Look, we can all easily identify bishops who are knaves, fools or cowards.  For example,  Pierre Cauchon, the bishop who presided over the obscene first trial of Joan of Arc, was all three; yet for all his faults, he was still a bishop of the Church of Christ, and his flock was bound to give due respect and adherence to his teachings on faith and morals.  

It&#039;s an odd teaching in this day and age, when we are obsessed with credentials, charisma and popularity.  But it is an essential part of what makes us Catholics, rather than Protestants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The authority of a bishop has absolutely nothing to do with his personal merits or &#8220;credibility&#8221;.  It comes from the fact that he has received the fullness of the Sacrament of Holy Orders when he was ordained a bishop.  As such he has received the grace of being a successor of the Apostles, in communion with the Successor of Peter and all other Catholic bishops around the world and throughout time.  In union with them, he leads the particular church that has been entrusted to him and he teaches and governs with the authority of Christ.</p>
<p>Look, we can all easily identify bishops who are knaves, fools or cowards.  For example,  Pierre Cauchon, the bishop who presided over the obscene first trial of Joan of Arc, was all three; yet for all his faults, he was still a bishop of the Church of Christ, and his flock was bound to give due respect and adherence to his teachings on faith and morals.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s an odd teaching in this day and age, when we are obsessed with credentials, charisma and popularity.  But it is an essential part of what makes us Catholics, rather than Protestants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2522&#038;cpage=1#comment-40799</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 16:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2522#comment-40799</guid>
		<description>I am among the great many Catholics who will not blindly follow the US Catholic Bishops, who as a group, have lost their moral credibility. 

With the conviction of Monsignor William Lynn in Philadelphia, the unrefuted testimony about the cover-ups and child endangerment, and secret lists  by Cardinal Bevilacqua ,the upcoming criminal trial of Bishop Robert Finn in Kansas City,  the escape from justice and reward in Rome of Cardinal Bernard Law, the fact that many current bishops formerly held similar positions in several dioceses and are now ordinaries, and have been identified by SNAP (Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests) and the deafening silence of our bishops and cardinals on all of these matters ,  they all need reminded of the words of Our Lord in Matthew 7:5 before they go out attacking the government leaders and ignore their own households,  &quot;Hypocrite, first get rid of the log in your own eye, then you will see well enough to deal with the speck in your friend&#039;s eye&quot;.

The bishops can deal with these matters, the utter sexism that pervades the  institutional Church, the unwarranted attacks on our dear religious sisters, and become a model of justice and righteousness. Instead, they operate in secrecy, without transparency, and morally selective about their attacks. No religious liberty ?  Two-thirds of the monies for Catholic Charities comes from governmental sources.

In many respects, the alleged attacks on religious freedom that the bishops call anti-Catholic find other religions holding the opposite position of the Catholics. We live in a multi-religious, diverse society.  The Catholic hierarchy claims a type of religious supremacy of  the Catholic position always. Yet, the Catholics have left the negotiating table, and instead have resorted to pure political stunts in this election year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am among the great many Catholics who will not blindly follow the US Catholic Bishops, who as a group, have lost their moral credibility. </p>
<p>With the conviction of Monsignor William Lynn in Philadelphia, the unrefuted testimony about the cover-ups and child endangerment, and secret lists  by Cardinal Bevilacqua ,the upcoming criminal trial of Bishop Robert Finn in Kansas City,  the escape from justice and reward in Rome of Cardinal Bernard Law, the fact that many current bishops formerly held similar positions in several dioceses and are now ordinaries, and have been identified by SNAP (Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests) and the deafening silence of our bishops and cardinals on all of these matters ,  they all need reminded of the words of Our Lord in Matthew 7:5 before they go out attacking the government leaders and ignore their own households,  &#8220;Hypocrite, first get rid of the log in your own eye, then you will see well enough to deal with the speck in your friend&#8217;s eye&#8221;.</p>
<p>The bishops can deal with these matters, the utter sexism that pervades the  institutional Church, the unwarranted attacks on our dear religious sisters, and become a model of justice and righteousness. Instead, they operate in secrecy, without transparency, and morally selective about their attacks. No religious liberty ?  Two-thirds of the monies for Catholic Charities comes from governmental sources.</p>
<p>In many respects, the alleged attacks on religious freedom that the bishops call anti-Catholic find other religions holding the opposite position of the Catholics. We live in a multi-religious, diverse society.  The Catholic hierarchy claims a type of religious supremacy of  the Catholic position always. Yet, the Catholics have left the negotiating table, and instead have resorted to pure political stunts in this election year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2522&#038;cpage=1#comment-39515</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 23:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.archny.org/steppingout/?p=2522#comment-39515</guid>
		<description>Daniela,

I have checked out the Solidarity HS plan and have already signed up for early access.  I am interested in what they end up presenting in their package, and this would likely be the best alternative to the compromises in most private health insurance plans.

thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniela,</p>
<p>I have checked out the Solidarity HS plan and have already signed up for early access.  I am interested in what they end up presenting in their package, and this would likely be the best alternative to the compromises in most private health insurance plans.</p>
<p>thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
