The annual March for Life was held on Friday, in remembrance of the 40th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade decision. Several hundred thousand people joined in the largest annual civil rights demonstration in America, to witness to the cause of human life and its importance to our society.
After the March, I had the honor of participating in a panel discussion about the pro-life cause at the National Review Institute’s Future of Conservatism Summit. It was a very interesting conversation, covering topics such as health care, pregnancy resource centers, and the cultural and political trends in our nation. (It was broadcast live on CSPAN, and you can watch the video here).
The audience was very appreciative of the panel, and I got a good deal of positive feedback afterwards. That’s encouraging, because there has been a good bit of talk since the election about ejecting pro-lifers from the conservative movement — which I believe would be a disaster for American society.
But the positive reaction of the conservative audience also reinforced in my mind a sad realization: at this point in American history, it is inconceivable that I would be invited to have the same discussion at a conference of political liberals or progressives.
It has been made abundantly clear that pro-lifers are really not welcome any more in the liberal wing of politics or, indeed, in most of the Democratic Party. The platform of the national Democratic Party stated that the party opposed any restrictions on abortion; a prominent leader of the Party in New York has announced that one cannot be a Democrat without being “pro-choice”; and the President ran an aggressively and adamantly pro-abortion political campaign last year. Although there are some notable exceptions, the pro-life Democrat is becoming an endangered species.
This makes no sense to me. Life is not a partisan issue — it is a question of equal justice under the law and fundamental human rights. It is the ultimate issue of defending the little guy — as little a guy as you can get. And traditionally, liberalism/progressivism and the Democratic Party have styled themselves as the defenders of the little guys — workers, immigrants, ethnic minorities. They were the party of Al Smith and Sargent Shriver — two great Catholic gentlemen who were unabashed progressives and Democrats. Even as late as the 1970’s, prominent Democrats like Ted Kennedy and Jesse Jackson were openly pro-life.
I understand how and why this happened — it has a lot to do with the identification of abortion and sexual liberty as the centerpiece of modern feminism. But it has polarized our nation and politics, and it is a disaster for our society.
Last week, the President delivered his inaugural address. In that speech, he spoke about his and his party’s concern for defending human rights by alluding to Seneca Falls (the birthplace of women’s rights), Selma (a crucible for the civil rights movement) and Stonewall (the origin of the “gay rights” cause).
Sadly, he had no time to mention the human rights of the unborn. He could easily have done so, by a simple allusion to the Dred Scott decision, which excluded an entire class of human beings from the protection of the law.
Unfortunately, in our sad polarized politics, the liberal/progressive movement, much of the Democratic Party, and the current Administration believe, as did the misguided Supreme Court in Dred Scott, that unborn children have no rights that are bound to be respected by those lucky enough to have been born.