My Catholic Voting Decision

[Several years ago, in anticipation of Election Day, I posted on my personal opinion about how to approach making a voting decision.  I’ve revised and combined those earlier posts, because the stakes in the current election are so high — it is vital that we maintain a pro-life majority in our state Senate.]

Once again, Election Day approaches.  At times like these, I am frequently asked how people can do the right thing as voters, as citizens, and as Catholics.  As I understand the teachings of our Church, there are several critical questions involved here. The first is the formation of my conscience.  Our bishops have said quite clearly that

“Conscience is not something that allows us to justify doing whatever we want, nor is it a mere ‘feeling’ about what we should or should not do.” (Faithful Citizenship 17)

A good, Catholic conscience is obedient to the teachings of the Church, and open to hearing the voice of God.  It considers God’s will more important than any partisan interest that I may have.  It always directs me to do good and avoid evil, and in the case of voting,

“A well-formed Christian conscience does not permit one to vote for a political program or an individual law which contradicts the fundamental contents of faith and morals.” (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, The Participation of Catholics in Political Life 4)

Building on the proper formation of conscience, we can then turn to the issues and the candidates.  One thing is crystal clear at this point:  all the issues are not the same, and the defense of human life is the paramount issue for Catholics to consider. The teaching of our Church is clear:  we must vote pro-life.  As the United States Bishops have said,

“This exercise of conscience begins with outright opposition to laws and other policies that violate human life or weaken its protection.” (Faithful Citizenship 31). “The direct and intentional destruction of innocent human life from the moment of conception until natural death is always wrong and is not just one issue among many. It must always be opposed.” (Faithful Citizenship 28)

This means that in evaluating a candidate, we must consider, first and foremost, their position on the defense of human life.  As the U.S. Bishops have said:

“As Catholics we are not single-issue voters. A candidate’s position on a single issue is not sufficient to guarantee a voter’s support. Yet candidate’s position on a single issue that involves an intrinsic evil, such as support for legal abortion or the promotion of racism, may legitimately lead a voter to disqualify a candidate from receiving support.” (Faithful Citizenship 42)

Our New York Bishops have said the same:

“The inalienable right to right of every innocent human person outweighs other concerns where Catholics may use prudential judgment, such as how best to meet the needs of the poor or to increase access to health care for all.” (New York State Bishops, Our Cherished Right, Our Solemn Duty)

Cardinal Egan once confronted us, in language as plain as possible,with the choice of conscience and discipleship that we face when going into the voting booth:

Look [at the pictures of unborn children] and decide with honesty and decency what the Lord expects of you and me as the horror of ‘legalized’ abortion continues to erode the honor of our nation. Look, and do not absolve yourself if you refuse to act.”

Cardinal Egan also once said,

Anyone who dares to defend that [an unborn child] may be legitimately killed because another human being ‘chooses’ to do so or for any other equally ridiculous reason should not be providing leadership in a civilized democracy worthy of the name.

This also means, of course, that we have to inform ourselves about where candidates stand on the issues.  We can’t just blunder around the voting booth with no information.  And given the abundance of data available on the internet, it really doesn’t take much effort to find out about the position of candidates.  Just visit their websites, and see where they stand on abortion, “reproductive rights”, “choice”, and, in the case of New York State candidates, the “Women’s Equality Act” (which contains a provision that would greatly expand abortion in our state).  An example of an informational voter guide, from a reliable outside organization, can be found here.

So, from my perspective, this boils down to a very simple test that I try to adhere to, as best I can: If you think that killing unborn children should be legal, then I won’t vote for you. You haven’t earned my vote.  In my opinion, you’re not qualified to hold public office.  I just won’t vote for someone who will promote or permit grave evil.  I don’t subscribe to the principle of the “lesser of two evils”.  All that means is I’m voting for evil, and it still produces evil in the end.  If there’s nobody in a race that fits my standards, I’ll leave the line blank or write in a name.

When I pick up my ballot on Tuesday, I will see a stark choice between candidates who are pro-abortion, and others who are pro-life.  In fact, several of the pro-abortion candidates (who were baptized as Catholics, sad to say) are not just mouthing the old “personally opposed but…” sham, but are instead ardent promoters and defenders of the legalized killing of unborn children, and they have strongly campaigned on the issue.  If they are elected, there is a grave danger that the evil abortion expansion plan hidden in the “Women’s Equality Act” will be pushed forward. I cannot see how I as a Catholic could vote for such persons.

So for me, the choice is easy — I will vote only for the pro-life candidates.

(Important Note: I am going to repeat what is said in the disclaimer on the side of this blog — the opinions expressed here are mine and mine alone, they do not in any way reflect an official position of the Archdiocese, nor should they be considered an endorsement of any candidate by the Archdiocese.)


One Response to “My Catholic Voting Decision”

  1. Peter Rox says:

    First, let me make it clear, that I am against abortion.

    However, have you considered that there are many reasons and paths in the decision to have an abortion? A great many persons choose abortion because they are living on the edge financially. The middle class has been shrinking, higher education has become incredibly expensive ( and most of those who get higher education graduate with huge debt, including from Catholic colleges and universities), the party that claims to be pro-life is also vehemently against a living wage, and fights vigorously against evening raising the minimum wage (which is far less than a living wage).
    One of the few options that many young people see out of poverty, and for an education benefit if they survive, is to joint the so-called “volunteer army”. The military ads do not show the results of such service for a great many: that if they survive their tours of duty, they may be permanently maimed, homeless, with a very inferior VA health system. Also, a large percentage of those who survive the war zone return with post-traumatic stress disorder. Again, the so-called “pro-life” party is the most adamantly pro-war, pro invading more countries, pro huge amounts of military spending.
    Our church is supposedly “pro-life”, yet, large numbers of unwanted children languish in institutions and are not adopted. In some instances, the Catholic Church through its various charities, has even withdrawn from acting as an adoption agency (something that it once did rather well in most places), because it would not handle adoptions to gay persons. Note, that greatly insufficient heterosexuals have been stepping up to the plate and adopting themselves, thus the need for the institutions. Also on this point, a large percentage of the “hard-to-place” children are being adopted by gays, including handicapped kids, older children, children from less in demand minority groups for adoption.
    The so called pro-life party sponsors and passes almost all the so-called “corporate welfare” legislation and the many tax loopholes for the big moneyed interests, all to the detriment to the average person, both on the federal and state levels.
    Historically, the so called ‘pro-life party” has led the battle against almost any type of civil rights legislation, been anti-immigrant, and against equal pay for equal work for women.
    With the republicans so wrong on so many issues, merely looking at the abortion issue is not giving a full picture of who is really pro-life. It stand to reason that at least some women would choose not to have abortions if they had equal pay for equal work. Other women would choose not to have abortions if they were not so burdened buy the hopeless weight of all the student loans, etc etc.
    In summation, the reality is that social justice issues are most certainly pro-life issues, and we should view them this way rather than through the single lens of abortion.